Tag Archive for: Adaptation

Hanken & Sse logo

Next generation leadership

Our youngest colleagues, Generations Y and Z are transforming the future of work, management and leadership. If you want them to thrive and deliver value, you’ll need to do some serious thinking first.

Ask anyone over the age of 40, and they’ll likely say the same thing: promotion, reward, and the steady climb up the corporate ladder are all earned and paid for by commitment to the job, loyalty to the company and perhaps more than anything else, by investing the time at work. It takes time – several years – to really learn the ropes and to demonstrate readiness for more responsibility. However, our youngest generations in the workplace have turned much of this accepted wisdom on its head.

A generation on the move

HR leaders and managers describe a new wave of workers who are prone to leave their jobs with ‘frightening’ rapidity. This is a generation that stays around for two to five years before moving on to the next opportunity; a cohort that cleaves more to purpose than to material reward, that demands to know why as much as what they are required to contribute or accomplish, and whose primary dedication is not to the organisation but to the immediate team and the individuals who surround them.

Generation Y and Z are our leaders of tomorrow. And they are starting to agree to positions of influence already. They are also causing friction with existing leaders who don’t know how to manage them.

In researching my book, Next Generation Leadership: How to Ensure Young Talent Will Thrive With Your Organization, I had plenty of opportunity to survey, interview and observe Generations Y and Z, as well as the organisations and managers who hire them. The core issue is a shift in priorities, expectations and values; a sea-change in the paradigms of work and leadership that set the upcoming generation apart from (and very often at odds with) the existing leaders. And it’s not their fault.

Economic and social realities impacting younger generations

You have to remember that this is a generation that won’t have the security of retiring on a defined benefit (final salary) pension. The golden handcuffs and a job for life simply don’t exist for them. They’re also the first generation that will experience the 100-year life as a reality, as explained by London Business School Professors Lynda Gratton and Andrew Scott. Now, as we live longer, the expectation is that we’ll also have to work longer; the luxury of retiring at 65 will be replaced by the necessity to go on working into our 80s. Many Millennials will be spending probably sixty years of their life working, and that has shifted expectations and driven a stronger feeling of choosing where they work, who they work for and how long they choose to stay.

    The younger generation also prioritises values beyond material possessions, such as purpose, development, culture and work-life balance, demonstrating a broader perspective on what constitutes fulfilment compared to their forebears, who were mainly focused on salaries, bonuses and promotions.  Capitalism is a ‘fungible concept,’ and as these emerging leaders assume influence, we are likely to see a swing in focus from outcomes to outputs: from returns and share prices to impact and value for customers, employees, communities and the world.

    The need for leadership recalibration

    To manage this new generation more effectively and to ensure that they thrive, deliver value and feel better connected to the business, organisations need to start thinking differently.

    I believe today’s leaders need to rethink their ideas and expectations about managing tomorrow’s leaders. There are things that the Baby Boomer and X generations have to let go of: the idea that young talent will stick around forever, that investment in things like development and training is tied to occupation, or that emerging leaders must be 100% dedicated to their job at the expense of all other interests or activities. We need to embrace their agility and recognise that the workforce can be fluid without it always damaging our long-term prospects.

    But how do we enact this kind of shift in thinking? My work over fifteen years with emerging high-potential leaders and their companies harvests key insights. I surveyed such talent across 44 countries, complementing quantitative evidence with qualitative analysis across a sample that spans highly diverse industries and sectors. My findings point to a broad homogeneity in their priorities – a generational ‘tightening’ that stems from having much in common. They are the first truly global generation, the first to be digitally connected from the start, and a generation who will live – and work – longer than their predecessors by a considerable margin. This consistency or homogeneity makes it possible to see Generations Y and Z as a more coherent group while recognising that to discuss generations does force one to generalise, but I urge us not to dismiss the findings merely because one can find an exception: If we can better understand patterns and trends that are more true than not, then this can only benefit our ability to manage and empathise with our youngest colleagues.

    Six strategies for managing young talent

    This, in turn, makes it possible to distil insights about them into actionable ideas for their managers: practical frameworks, strategies and tools that he shares to ensure that young talent can thrive within today’s organisations.

    Here are six effective strategies for successfully managing and nurturing young top talent:

    1. Articulate your purpose: Be proactive in terms of helping employees articulate their purpose and help them connect it to the mission of your organisation. An impactful and cost-effective means of doing this is to put together a workshop. Build this around two central ideas: Why should talent work here versus anywhere else? Why should customers come to us versus anyone else?
    2. Hold each other to account: Organisational culture is something that needs to be engineered versus emerging organically. Aim for transparency, responsibility and accountability as a rule, and be clear about the kinds of behaviour that model your organisation’s ethos. Consider what behaviours, if shared among your bellwethers, would become new norms.
    3. Be fluid about development: Understand that development opportunities should not be tied to tenure. There are a host of cost-effective measures your organisation can take to weave training and development into everyday life, from shadowing to coaching to international placements to secondments. Aim to think more dynamically about development.
    4. Re-consider what work-life balance means: The top priority for Generations Y and Z is work-life balance, a request many organisations have resisted. However, the shift to remote work has made it essential for employers to adapt. Even post-pandemic, our digitally connected workforce must become adept at managing virtual teams, as a complete return to pre-pandemic norms is unlikely. Through experimentation, I’ve found that certain tasks are more effective in virtual settings. For instance, brainstorming sessions benefit from an asynchronous discussion board, which minimises the influence of dominant voices and fosters a more equitable exchange of ideas. Work-life balance often sparks generational misunderstandings. Baby Boomers and Generation X tend to view it as a “when” request, mistakenly believing that younger generations seek to work less. In contrast, Gen Y and Z see it as a “where” request, viewing the traditional 9-to-5 model as outdated in a world where technology allows constant connectivity. Emerging leaders crave flexibility and autonomy in how and where they work. It’s crucial for organisations to ensure clarity in their policies to avoid differing interpretations across generations. The current climate of self-isolation offers a valuable opportunity to practice effective remote work strategies.
    5. See the value in side hustles (projects on the side): Talented young people often have interests that go beyond their role or your organisation. Whether it’s charity work, a personal website or projects that leverage professional skills, try to reframe these activities as sources of dynamism – both intra- and entrepreneurial development. Encourage your employees to pursue opportunities to learn – and to share that learning.
    6. Be flexible about people leaving: After all, they might well come back. Try to onboard new staff faster. It shouldn’t take two years to learn the ropes. Encourage a sense of fluidity that leaves the door open so that your leavers build new skills and knowledge to bring that back to your organisation should they choose to return further down the line. Embrace this fluidity and find ways to make it work to your advantage. Many professional services firms are world-class at cultivating an alumni network of former colleagues, even hosting reunions!

    As Generation Y and Z accede to leadership, I believe that our world of work is set to become more ‘human’. The real challenge for today’s employers is to leverage this forward momentum to the advantage of the organisation.

    Prepare your leaders for the future. Discover how we can help your organisation develop leadership strategies that align with the expectations of the next generation. Learn more

    About author

    Image for Adam Kingl
    Adam Kingl
    Adam Kingl is a faculty member with Hanken SSE and an author, keynote speaker and consultant. His most recent book is Sparking Success: Why Every Leader Needs to Develop a Creative Mindset (Kogan Page, 2023), which was shortlisted for the Business Book of the Year Awards in the Smart Thinking Category. He is also the author of Next Generation Leadership (HarperCollins, 2020). He served as Executive Director of Learning and Thought Leadership at London Business School for a decade. He is a dual British-American citizen, living in London. www.adamkingl.com
    1 red paper boat leading 8 white paper boats on a grey background

    Purpose Focused Leadership

    A common mistake for leaders is to conflate what motivates them with what motivates the individuals in their team.  As a result, leaders can struggle to recruit, engage and retain their high performers.[i]  For this reason, managers must be intensely curious about why their people chose their respective careers, why they do what they do and why they do it with this organization instead of any other.  Dave Crawford, Executive of Ride Engineering for Disney Imagineers, continuously returns to these questions for his team, ‘Are you encouraged that you are on the right path?  Am I developing you in the right manner and direction for that path?’  All manner of actions and development opportunities become clearer and personal based on the answers to those questions.  Too many companies assume that an annual review or personal development plan is based solely on the person’s current role, time in role and assumed next role.  But careers today are far less linear and predictable than they were even twenty-five years ago.  To be curious about motivation and one’s paradigms about work-life, how people like to be managed or how they see their career progressing is to be attuned to motivation.  And to be attuned to motivation is to facilitate an environment where innovation may thrive.

    Do not assume that the answers you may receive to these types of ‘purpose’ questions are static either.  They can and do change over time, and this is increasingly common.  So it’s necessary to keep returning to asking, sense checking, and testing your assumptions if you truly understand your people today versus six months ago.  I would even suggest beginning every review, development and feedback conversation with these types of questions because they provide very useful context for the manager to adapt and give rationale for why they may be giving this feedback or suggesting this development plan beyond the anodyne reason, ‘Well, the company says so.’ 

    Any project you give to a direct report will be more engaging to them if you can explain how it fits within and develops their purpose.  There are all manner of projects, shadowing, coaching, mentoring, secondments or international placements that all of a sudden become intriguing if you can create a golden thread between the activity and the individual’s purpose.  Your approach is of course more human and personal, and you have also helped the person clearly to understand how their company helps them to achieve their dreams, and how doing what they do in turn contributes to the organisation’s mission.  There is no greater engagement and retention tool that leaders have at their disposal.      

    Adam Kingl is an author, keynote speaker and educator. His books are Sparking Success (Kogan Page) and Next Generation Leadership (HarperCollins). For more, please visit his website, www.adamkingl.com.

    [i] For more on this theme, see my book Next Generation Leadership (New York: HarperCollins, 2020). 

    Two pandas, one eating bamboo, the other looking confused.

    Opening the Door to Inspiration

    By Adam Kingl

    Very early on in my experience teaching and consulting to creative companies, and then to organisations in all industries, I identified a three-part structure to invent and explore new ideas within a team dynamic: ideate, evaluate, select.  This structure does not imply that you accomplish everything in one conversation; it might require several.  The approach outlined below can be facilitated with groups as small as three and as large as a hundred.  But this is a structure that has served my teams well.

    1.     Ideate

    Everyone proposes ideas.  Nothing is shot down.  You’re going for quantity, not quality.  So much research on creativity indicates that the best ideas emerge from many ideas, rather than one, proposed at the beginning.  Ask the team to consider the answers to the ‘exam question’ well before you all meet in person.  This will be helpful for the introverts in your team.  Stress that you want a LOT of ideas rather than each person to bring ‘their best idea’.  You don’t want the team to edit itself, as the group itself can pull out value and explore the hidden depths in an idea more than the individual owner of the idea could.  When you get together, ask everyone to say or write down (writing it all down on a wall may be best) all their ideas without any feedback.  Then ask, ‘What else?’  Ideas proposed may have sparked new ones that haven’t yet been offered.  Capture those topics too.

    At this stage, think of yourself and your team as an oak tree.  The oak wants to produce more little trees, but it doesn’t know where the best combination of soil, moisture and sunlight will be.  So its strategy is to drop thousands of acorns over as wide a space as possible.  The tree maximises its chances that some of those acorns will land on the perfect plot of land.

    On the other hand, most organizations when trying to produce new ideas behave more like pandas when they try to reproduce.  Pandas may want to produce little pandas, but they seem to want to get it right in one go or not attempt the activity.  So a panda couple will try once per year if they’re lucky and frequently requiring the encouragement of their zoo keepers: mood music, aroma therapy, romantic dinners of bamboo canapes, you name it.  It’s such a rare occurrence that it becomes a global headline when a zoo announces a new baby panda.  As a result of these divergent strategies from nature, we know that we have no shortage of oak trees in the world, while pandas are an endangered species.  Here is the lesson: be the oak tree, not the panda!

    2.     Evaluate

    Only when the team has a wheelbarrow full of ideas should it even begin to assess which ones to explore further.  Only now do you formally close the ‘ideate’ stage, and move to ‘evaluate’ when you now want people to respond to the proposed ideas.  The team should all play the role of optimists first, and only when that stage is complete should the leader ask for devil’s advocates.  In other words, encourage people to first only ‘yes…and’ the ideas, or at the very least nominate their favourite ideas and why.  Try to solicit at least one ‘yes…and’ for every idea.  Only at the end of this stage should you ask the team why they may have concerns about some of the ideas, why they may not work, or why they don’t excite.

    As the leader, you should always contribute last in the ‘evaluate’ phase!  If you state your opinion at this early stage, everyone else will assume that the decision has already been made.  And if the leader judges every idea as soon as it’s proposed, immediately playing devil’s advocate, they find in short order that no one pitches any more ideas!  Before deciding to kill a proposition, it’s useful as well to consider the mood and energy of the room.  In this way, the soil is fertilised for the next request for pitching new ideas, as everyone’s egos have been protected.  After this exercise, then one can reasonably decide a short list of the best concepts.

    3.     Select

    Based on the previous stage, what ideas excite us most, have the biggest upside, the smallest downside, the easiest to implement?  Which ideas, though perhaps difficult to execute, would be worth the effort?  You don’t necessarily have to bring it down to the one idea and declare, ‘OK.  We’re doing this!’  The reality in corporate life is that you may now have to run this by other people who are not in the room.  However, you now have a lot of reasons, perspectives and additional contexts to contribute to those conversations as a result of the team’s brainstorming.  The team leader needs the bigger picture perspective in making the selection of which idea or ideas to pursue from the shortlist.  Make sure the team knows the criteria in advance of the exercise, and then apply those criteria with some rigour.  In that manner, selection is not subjective, random or showing favouritism.

    I cannot stress enough that, regardless of the size of the group, you must devote adequate time to this exercise.  First, while you may reach the point where all ideas in the room are captured if you hurry, you will not have true buy-in from the group.  Sure, everyone will have dutifully completed the exercises in the time allotted, but it will become about task completion rather than shared agreement that everyone can get behind these answers.  Second and related point, the meeting is not only about capturing ideas.  You will require at least as much time to discuss which ideas the group will willingly advocate as the time you spent generating those ideas in the first place.  Third, you need time to draw out multiple views.  If you rush, the extroverted personalities and/or the most senior people in the room will jump in with their ideas, and the introverts and junior colleagues will defer.  But silence does not imply assent; it might simply means that some people were not given adequate time or space to share their opinions.  Fourth and finally, and perhaps it goes without saying, but the participants in this exercise should ideally include those with the authority and influence to align the company or department around the decisions made during the meeting(s), but these discussions should not solely involve these people.

    Adam Kingl is the author of Sparking Success: Why Every Leader Needs to Develop a Creative Mindset (Kogan Page, 2023), shortlisted for the Business Book of the Year Awards 2024 in the Smart Thinking category. He has also written Next Generation Leadership (HarperCollins, 2020). Adam is an educator, keynote speaker and consultant. He is an adjunct faculty member at the UCL School of Management and Hult International Business School (Ashridge). You can find more of his media at www.adamkingl.com.

    Silhoutte actors against a red curtain

    An Abridged Improv Playbook for Brainstorming

    Here is a playbook, if you will, that you can run with your teams to challenge, adjust and improve team creativity, comfort with change and explore when we don’t have the answer. 

     

    What’s in the box?

    This is a brainstorming technique that rewards volume over quality or judgement.  Explain to the team that we’re going to identify as many solutions to a problem or opportunity as possible.  Put the team in pairs.  The pair should be standing up.  You propose the question for the team to work on, such as:

    ·       How might we attract more customers to our store?

    ·       How do we reduce our energy costs?

    ·       What other flavours of doughnut should we make?

    In each pair, the first person’s job is to invent as many solutions to the question as possible.  With each answer, they reach down into an invisible box and pull out the solution.  Physically reaching for the answer helps the brain to come up with the next answer on cue and reduces the instinct to pause and think, repressing the creative flow. 

    The other person’s job is to write down what the other person says and encourage them, always encourage them: ‘Amazing idea!  What else do you have?  Oh, brilliant!  Can we think of more?’  This is actually a tough job too because this colleague has to write down what they’re hearing and respond with encouragement at the same time.

    The facilitator should set and announce a time limit, such as two to three minutes, then ask the pairs to switch roles and repeat the exercise.  Collect everyone’s lists, and you will be amazed how many ideas you will have to explore in more detail. 

     

    And even better…

              This is a game of escalation that is a good option if you want to brainstorm more elaborated, new solutions.  It’s a variation of ‘yes, and’ and is usually played in groups of two to four.  Questions could include topics such as:

    ·       What would happen if we opened an office in Germany?

    ·       What if we allowed customers to make up their own cocktail recipes at the bar?

    Pose your question and the first person will start to invent a scenario.  Let them speak for about fifteen seconds.  Then cue the second person, who needs to continue where the first person left off.  They should start their explanation by saying ‘And even better…’  Because of that prefacing statement, the scenario quickly escalates.  Within five to eight speakers, you typically will have either achieved world peace or solved world hunger!  But if you then look back to two or three statements before that final conclusion, you might have uncovered some advantages or implications that you hadn’t considered previously and might make the idea much more intriguing and worth exploring further.  

     

    If I were…

              In this exercise, you do not explore an idea through the lens of your own organization or context but through another which you deeply admire.  For example, instead of asking, ‘How should we launch this soft drink brand in Amsterdam?’ you might ask, ‘If I were Richard Branson, how would I launch this drink brand in Amsterdam?’  Now you’ve unlocked the restrictions the unconscious places around you.  You might now brainstorm as if possessed:

    ·       We’ll create a surf machine in an Amsterdam canal, and the surfers will be drinking the soda and wearing branded bathing suits!

    ·       During a warm summer week, we’ll give all the Amsterdam street musicians a bucket of our sodas on ice, which will encourage pedestrians to stop, enjoy a free drink, listen to the music and pay the performer.  

    ·       We’ll give away branded beverage holders to Amsterdam bicycle owners, which is basically everyone!

    Brainstorming through the perspective of another person or company frees your creativity, unburdened with your or your organization’s assumptions about ‘how we do things around here’.  All of a sudden, you find yourself considering ideas or actions that you would never have entertained before.      

    Brain scan

    How Are We Creative? The Realm of Neuroscience

    I attempt to stay firmly and proudly in the practitioner camp in terms of my perspective and professional life. Research is a tremendous gift to humankind in our search for truth, particularly in this age of so-called ‘fake news’. Could I say anything less, given I’ve spent most of my life studying in and working for universities? But for the realm in which I operate in terms of my clients, that of the business world, the most important question to answer is, ‘What do I do with this insight? How does this move me or my organization forward?’ So how might we apply some of the insights I learned from the realm of neuroscience?

    We know that we have to build in time for the brain to focus on the new and unexpected, proactively seeking surprise, reflection and experimentation. The best advice an executive coach ever gave me was to block out time, at least three hours but ideally a day, in my diary every week that was just for me. This time was sacrosanct; no one could get a meeting or call with me during that window unless the topic was specifically a creative or adaptive challenge. And this coach was adamant that I should not use the time to catch up with work. It was not ‘free’ time but had its own purpose, which was most certainly not to fulfil the day to day but to engage my creative muscles.

    I found that Friday afternoons worked best for a couple of reasons. First, as the work week was nearing its close, colleagues and clients slowed their pace a little, and some escaped early for the weekend, so it was easier to keep that time blocked out. Second, since changing my environment would also stimulate different neurons in my brain, Friday afternoons were also easier to spend outside my or my clients’ offices. Surely maximizing my creative opportunities would not be best served sitting at my desk at work, staring at my trusty laptop, waiting for inspiration to pounce, jaguar-like, onto my unsuspecting scalp. So even if I did book a creative meeting with a colleague, I would usually insist that we hold it elsewhere: a park, museum, gallery, funky café, you get the idea. This tip reminds me of a similar piece of advice given to me by one my mentors many years ago: ‘Pick different routes to work.’ In other words, don’t get stuck in routine and allow yourself to be surprised by different sights, paths, parks, trains, bus routes, stores, blocks and people.

    The funny thing is that, when I did have a meeting outside the office in an untraditional space, inevitably my colleagues would comment how refreshing and stimulating it was to meet in a new environment, yet when the next meeting request came along, they usually suggested meeting at our desks or in a bland conference room again! It just goes to show how pernicious and deep our habits are, how dominant and comforting it is to dwell in Beta state – where our brain wave frequency is stuck in ‘gentle awareness’ mode. It would be comforting to assume we could disrupt our environments and routines as little as possible and somehow transform into creative geniuses through willpower alone. As Hemingway mused in The Sun Also Rises, ‘Isn’t it pretty to think so?’ But our own brains’ habits oppose that ambition until we train them to be receptive.

    BusinessGraduatesAssocLogo

    Humanising leadership through the arts: part II

    Humanising leadership through the arts: part II

    Adam Kingl examines why we’re lacking in creativity and demonstrates how leaders can make simple changes to shift mindsets and reinvigorate their organisations

    In the first part of this two-part article, I made the case for recreating work around human fulfilment by learning from the arts and curbing the demise of creativity in our organisations. But if we’re going to adopt more practices from the arts to be fit for tomorrow, we might well ask if we have sufficiently innate creativity to accomplish this goal. When I facilitate workshops on innovation for business, I usually begin a session by saying: “Please raise your hand if you do not regularly think of yourself as a creative person.” Almost inevitably, I’m confronted with a forest of arms signalling agreement with this statement. But if we reflect on our childhoods, we intuitively understand that the exact opposite would be true. As children, we are supremely creative human beings.

    Creative capacity inverted

    The late professor George Land at the University of Minnesota assessed 1,600 people over their development from children to adults on their ‘genius’ levels of creativity, defined as ‘divergent thinking’. With research already establishing that high IQ and creative aptitude are not correlated, Land’s study produced some intriguing results. At ages three to five, 98 per cent of test subjects scored as creative geniuses. At ages eight to 10, that plummeted to 32 per cent. At ages 13-15, only 10 per cent were geniuses, and by age 25, a paltry two per cent were still creative paragons. Notice that by the time these children reached adulthood, their creative capacity completely and exactly inverted (see Greg Orme’s The Human Edge). At the youngest ages, only two per cent were not considered creative geniuses, while as adults only two per cent continued to score as creative geniuses.

    These results may not surprise us. When I discuss this study, most people respond that school and society are to blame, incentivising conformity and ‘one right answer’ thinking.  If that diagnosis is true, then the solution is apparent as well. For us, individually as adults and collectively as organisations, we must rediscover at least some of the rhythms, routines, incentives and habits that we practiced as children.

    For starters, I’m sure we all remember that a typical day as small children included an abundance of art and play. Isn’t it funny that the corporations that we celebrate today, from Google and Kickstarter to Pixar and LEGO, create those same environments of art and play in their cultures that most of our organisations work terribly hard to suppress?

    Catalysing shifts in mindset

    While I am indeed advocating for revolutionising how we work, I stress that such revolutions begin at the level of the individual within their own work life. Leaders, of course, have an overweighted influence in what is prioritised and how their culture is role-modelled among their teams and organisations. The payoff then has a high rate of return in that a small degree of personal change may catalyse widespread shifts in habit and mindset in the people around the leader. Such shifts then allow both leader and team, and even company, to enable the priorities of innovation, adaptability and inspiration to materialise rather than to languish eternally as aspirations.

    In humankind’s quest to perfect the process by which we create wealth, the previous ménage à trois between science, business and art became a cosier domestic arrangement between science and commerce, elbowing the arts into the periphery, in terms of the habits, goals and philosophies of leadership and organisational life. This paucity of artistic creativity and inspiration is a symptom of the Industrial Revolution (1760-1914), an era that perfected the philosophy of Frederick Winslow Taylor’s scientific management. That philosophy hypothesised that the way in which we should organise business is to drive efficiency in and variance out, implying that a human labourer is but a cog in an industrial machine. ‘Taylorism’ was perfect for the manufacturing heyday of a century ago when Henry Ford once famously quipped, “Why is it that every time I hire a pair of hands a brain comes attached?”

    Nurturing adaptability, creativity and inspiration

    Over a short period of time, the skyscape of business lost its constellation of artistic exploration – a critical mindset laid to waste. We dehumanised our companies in perfecting Taylorism and combined that philosophy with the obeyance-driven, hierarchical architecture of the Roman legions. Yet today, we lament that we lack humanity in our work life.  Why are we surprised? Adaptability, creativity and inspiration are the leadership qualities that our organisations require today. Both employer and employee need these capabilities now and we don’t have centuries to develop them anymore. Making these qualities preeminent in our organisations is the next revolution and there’s still time to be at the forefront of this changing tide.

    In rediscovering the virtuous habits of art and play, we can spark and nurture the characteristics of innovation. This encompasses divergent thinking, collaboration, mindfulness, inspiration, as well as the ability to explore untraditional ideas and picture the future. In so doing, we can uncover anew the state of mind and spirit that we have always naturally possessed and encourage an environment among our companies that we have always craved as individuals.

    Read the first part of this two-part series on Business Impact.

    Adam Kingl is the author of Sparking Success (Kogan Page, 2023) and an adjunct faculty member at UCL School of Management and Hult Ashridge Business School. He is also an associate of the Møller Leadership Institute at Churchill College, University of Cambridge.

     

    ** This blog originally appeared on businessgraduatesassociation.com on 23 July 2023.

    1718640270857

    On Perfection and Innovation

    Perfection is not a precondition for invention or reinvention.  The culinary arts teach us this lesson so aptly.    

    The doyen of fine dining in New York City, Chef Andre Soltner, speaks to an important concept in pursuing excellence when he said that ‘it works well most nights,’ the idea that perfection is worthy of the pursuit itself but may not ever be fully attainable.  As Martha Ortiz, the chef at Mexico City’s Dulce Patria, describes, ‘Creativity becomes a vessel for us to deliver the flavours of our food.  I don’t believe the perfect dish exists, but as chefs, part of our craft is striving for perfection hoping to create a masterpiece.’[i]  Or as chef Ana Roš of Slovenia’s Hiša Franko observes, ‘You dream about perfection and are always on the hunt, but…imperfection is the engine for evolution.  I do not believe there are signature dishes that should never be changed or modified.  Evolution, like the rest of nature, is unstoppable and we must always adapt to change.’[ii] 

    There are a few reasons that we never achieve complete perfection.  First, perfection is in the eye of the beholder; nothing would be perceived as perfect to everyone.  Second, short of robotic manufacturing, no output will always be identical to its predecessors.  It is as important to acknowledge this in cooking as it is in music, theatre, painting, or professional services such as management consulting.  The nature of human-produced repetition inevitably includes variation, which by definition precludes perfection: Third, one never experiences the same sensation twice: ‘All sensations are modified through repetition, for the very fact of recurrence alters the nature of the sensation.’[iii] 

    Just as one chef would not invent a new dish in exactly the same way as another colleague, the culinary arts teach us at least three approaches to innovation.  Perhaps the fastest method is to combine one idea with a previously unrelated one and brainstorm what that marriage could resemble, such as Chef Bobby Chinn in Hanoi creating Wasabi Mash.  This routine produces a high volume of new concepts, which is always desirable.  A second process is the singular, novel idea, and the stories of these chefs demonstrates that this takes time and cannot be forced.  A new ingredient such as Ferran Adrià’s foam (an ‘ingredient’ we didn’t see on our plates more than twenty years ago) required proactively creating the space for the concept to gestate and the patience to iterate.  The third method is personal reinvention, such as Chef Alain Passard’s (of three Michelin starred restaurant Arpege in Paris) philosophical pivot from meat and fish to mostly vegetarian cuisine.  Our choices, routines, habits, and assumptions can stifle creativity if we do not occasionally step back and reflect on which of these help us and which are no longer useful.  Redefining what we do or how we wish the world to perceive us can open new avenues and in itself realise personal adaptability.    

    Adam Kingl, www.adamkingl.com, is the author of Sparking Success: Why Every Leader Needs to Develop a Creative Mindset. Please visit his website for more on his writing and speaking on these themes.  


    [i] Rahim Kanani, A Wealth of Insight: The World’s Best Chefs on Creativity, Leadership, and Perfection (Black Truffle Press, 2019) 130. 

    [ii] Ibid, 23. 

    [iii] Suzanne Guerlac, Thinking in Time (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006), 73.

    1553167122028

    Is your organization ready for ‘Generation Blizzard’?

    Rather than molding Gen Z to fit the workplace, L&D can create a way of working that’s fit for the future.

    Gen Z could have up to ten times more employers than their grandparents had. That’s according to research by Adam Kingl, Adjunct Faculty at Hult International Business School. Companies have already experienced high turnover among millennials in the wake of the financial crash. “Now, with Gen Z mimicking that habit, it’s not a surprise,” says Kingl. But if you’re already jaded by attrition spikes and think it’s par for the course, you could be losing talent unnecessarily. “If they’re leaving the organization with frightening rapidity, you’ve got to change your habits.”Job hopping is always more typical among junior workers – it’s something Jo Owen tapped into after co-founding Teach First in 2001. “We realized there’s actually a strong market in what we call the ‘first bouncer market’” – junior workers looking to pivot into something different.

    “The question is: are things different for 20-year-olds today versus 20-year-olds thirty or forty years ago?” asks Owen, who sits on Hult EF Corporate Education’s Global Advisory Council. “Most of the time, the answer has actually been no – but now, it is.”


    Cohort birth years:

    – Baby Boomers: 1946-1964

    – Gen X: 1965-1980

    – Gen Y (Millennials): 1981-1996

    – Gen Z: 1997-2012

    – Gen Alpha: 2013-present


    Between the cost-of-living crisis and the ripple effects of Covid-19 furlough and lockdown, “the youngest people have had a really rough time as they’ve entered the workforce,” says Owen. “Gen Z are often called ‘snowflakes’ but, you know, a lot of snowflakes make a blizzard – maybe they’re really Generation Blizzard.”

    What’s changed?

    1. It’s harder to connect Companies know this group wants to be in the office to learn – the challenge is enticing senior people in. As Owen points out, “the older generations have nice home offices far away from work. They want to ditch the commute and, critically, they already have those networks of influence and support.”

    2. Mental health is deteriorating  

    Striking data from the Resolution Foundation shows that Gen Z are more likely to experience mental health challenges than any other age group, and to be out of work because of it than people in their 40s. “Historically, it’s always older generations that have to take more time off because of their health,” says Owen. “So something very unusual is happening here.”

    3. Purpose matters more 

    “We’ve got a generation with a much stronger sense of values,” says Owen. This translates into attitudes toward employers, says Kingl: “They will not work with organizations that they feel are doing wrong by the planet or behaving unethically. It’s not enough to have articulated your purpose. Do you live it? Do your people experience it every day?”

    4. Their future is unclear

    Retirement is a much hazier prospect for young people to plan for than it was in the past. “What’s becoming increasingly important in the workforce is development, because they need to always be able to work well past what we currently consider retirement age, so they are seeking employers that make them more employable,” says Kingl. People expect development from their employer, “and if they’re not getting it, then they’re going to seek it elsewhere.”

    What can L&D do differently?

    “If you want to develop people, you have to understand their personal purpose,” says Kingl. “Otherwise, any development you give them is random. Leaders should always have that conversation with their people: ‘Why do you do what you do? Why do you choose to do it here?’” From here, you can connect their development to that story, and personalize their place within the organization.“From an L&D point of view, it isn’t about trying to extol the purpose of the firm,” Owen highlights. “You have to turn that round and help people discover their intrinsic motivation.” Unilever, for example, runs an in-house workshop: Discover your Purpose. When organizations focus on purpose, it supports well-being too.

    Altogether, there’s actually a radical and quite exciting agenda for L&D.

    Jo Owen, Global Advisory Council, Hult EF

    As for creating and maintaining connections, consider an alumni network. “Professional services organizations are often world-class at this, but most organizations don’t do it,” says Kingl. “It’s often more industry specific than common business practice.”It’s a missed opportunity, he says. “If people are leaving more often, you still have collective wisdom in the world of people who have been through your company. How can you foster a sense of community among your alumni? Is there a forum where they can talk with you and with one another? Do you hold reunions like universities?”

    It can also keep potential boomerangs warm. “If they’re leaving an organization every two to three years, they might come back,” says Kingl. “And if they do, you get all the benefits of their external perspective and the growth journey they’ve been on. But that will only happen if you exit them well.” This means being supportive of non-linear career paths. “People might still work for you for 10 or 15 years, just maybe not all in one go. Embrace that new way of way of working.”

    “Altogether, there’s actually a radical and quite exciting agenda for L&D,” says Owen. “It’s about helping Gen Z discover their purpose, and putting the right experiences in place with the right support. But it all comes down to L&D needing to reinvent itself around new realities.”

    Generation Blizzard is on its way and the forecast is clear: rather than shaping junior cohorts to fit into the workplace, it’s about evolving as a workplace to embrace new ways of working.

    What can you do now?

    → Ask your peopleStart the conversation about purpose with Gen Z-ers in the organization, formally or informally.


    Establish an alumni network

    This is one way of nurturing relationships after people move on, and can even keep potential boomerangs warm to eventually return.


    Set up reverse mentoring

    This fosters relationships up and down the chain and creates more flow in the organization.


    Stay open to people’s side hustles

    Kingl says that as long as personal projects don’t detract from the day job, it gives people a chance to stretch their entrepreneurial and business development muscles, which the organization can then benefit from.


    Give people autonomy over remote working

    When their future is hazy, affording people autonomy over work patterns leads to greater overall well-being.

    Further reading:

    – Next Generation Leadership, Adam Kingl– The Leadership Skills Handbook, Jo Owen

    Sparking Success

    Humanising leadership through the arts: part 2

    A NEW YEAR, A CREATIVE YOU: HOW TO COMBINE ARTISTIC AND HUMANISTIC MINDSETS FOR BUSINESS SUCCESS In keeping with our annual tradition, we begin the New Year with a book review on creativity! Here are some key insights and tips. Happy New Year! Madanmohan Rao

    Read more at: https://yourstory.com/2023/12/creativity-leadership-art-success-book-adam-kingl

    Thriving in the face of fast-moving trends and disruptions in the modern business landscape requires leaders to cultivate a more creative and humanistic mindset, according to the book Sparking Success: Why Every Leader Needs to Develop a Creative Mindset by Adam Kingl. The author profiles innovative approaches at organisations like Pixar, Disney, Unilever, 3M, Bosch, Panasonic, and Carnegie Hall. Each chapter ends with a useful ‘Monday morning’ checklist of actions that can be implemented by readers. Adam Kingl is Adjunct Faculty at the UCL School of Management, and was earlier an associate at Saatchi & Saatchi. He holds business and arts degrees from London Business School, UCLA and Yale. Kingl was raised in Silicon Valley and now lives in Surrey, UK.

    Read more at: https://yourstory.com/2023/12/creativity-leadership-art-success-book-adam-kingl

    “In these times where the lines between industries are blurring, cognitive diversity in innovation is more important than ever,” he urges. He calls for more cross-industry learning and cross-skills collaboration. Here are my key takeaways from this enjoyable and practical 225-page book.

    Foundations

    Times of technological change and business flux call for leadership approaches that are creative, humanistic, fluid, and agile. Inputs from the artistic sector are needed to help industrial age leaders better manage teams, ideate, innovate, improvise, adapt, and organise. The author draws inspiration from the Renaissance period, when commerce, science and the arts intermingled in a creative synergy. Unfortunately, much of this creativity and humanity seems lost in modern management. Five chapters provide management lessons drawn from the fields of jazz, writing, performing arts, entertainment, and even culinary arts. In these contexts, Kingl showcases a range of innovation types: strategy, product, process, technology, platform, and management.

    Jazz

    The improvisational, collaborative and spontaneous nature of jazz performances has a number of lessons for business. They include being comfortable with uncertainty, enhancing serendipity, exploring ideas, and making partners look good. Structure and practice are important, but so are working with constraints and being resilient. Kingl explains that truly creative leaders don’t always have the answers but are authentic, vulnerable and imaginative, and facilitate emergence of solutions from their team.

    Writing

    The world of writing shows the importance of humility required to encourage and reject many ideas before landing on the right one, Kingl explains. Feedback, a bigger picture, and a change of environment can help get unstuck. Techniques like discussing films while walking were used by the scriptwriters of Star Wars: The Force Awakens. The writers of Friends would pivot from the original script depending on audience attachment. Alternative perspectives from roles like optimist and devil’s advocate can help refine a plot. Breaking up into smaller groups or harnessing the pressure of a deadline can also speed up clarity. The author cautions that moving too quickly on ideas without seeking broad inputs can be damaging. Introverts and junior colleagues tend to defer to leaders who speak first.

    The performing arts

    Successful performers in theatre and music highlight the importance of the growth mindset. This involves willingness to learn, driving abilities through attitude, eagerness to experiment, and acceptance of failure as a source of learning. Business firms can bring in new perspectives via artist residency programmes. Storytelling can help create compelling and inspiring narratives, as shown in the creation of the National Youth Orchestra when the foundational idea was shared and socialised with donors. Making many smaller bets should go hand in hand with a few larger bets. Employees should be given room to be imaginative and entrepreneurial, and speak up when there are problems. Questions and conversations are more important than answers. “I have to behave like the founder of a startup,” says Clive Gillinson, executive and artistic director of the iconic Carnegie Hall in New York, who effectively combines creative and commercial leadership roles. Successful performers regularly take risks, pushing themselves as well as their audience. Reinventing and repositioning are key to long-term success. Examples here include saxophonist Sunny Rollins. Faith and conviction in the extra-ordinary are hallmarks of visionary leaders, as seen in the cases of Steve Jobs and Akio Morita. A passion and commitment to always connect to its audience helped Carnegie Hall pivot to online broadcasts and storytelling during the pandemic. “Successful leaders hold seemingly competitive dynamics in a creative tension: innovation and risk, freedom and constraint, prototype and fully-realised project, spontaneity and planning. The trick is not to choose one over the other,” Kingl observes.

    Entertainment

    One chapter addresses the ‘Imagineers’ of Disney, where engineering, design and customer experience are effectively blended. Human connection, artistic freewheeling, secure platforms, and rapid prototyping are the key enablers. Andrew McGuinness, Co-founder and CEO of multimedia entertainment company Elipsis, describes himself as an evangelist who motivates employees and inspires investors. “My challenge is simultaneously to be an architect, juggler, visionary, and accountant,” he explains. While motivation is important, Kingl cautions leaders against assuming that what motivates them also motivates their employees. They must regularly find out what employees dream about, and see how the company’s mission fits here.

    Culinary arts

    Celebrity chefs view cooking as a combination of science, art, skill, storytelling, and even divinity. Kingl illustrates combinatorial creativity in action in the food business with examples like the hot dog and ice-cream cone. Mixology and fusion cooking are widely popular today as experts push the boundaries of experimentation. Ferrand Adria’s El Bulli restaurant had a dedicated R&D team, and the restaurant would shut down for half a year just to invent new dishes and codify its experiments. In the world of toys, the author cites LEGO MINDSTORMS as an example of combinatorial, crowdsourced brainstorming. It leveraged its community of super-user consumers to invent and test different products. As for reinvention, Alain Passard switched from being a meat preparation expert to launching a vegetarian restaurant. He thus legitimised vegetables as “worthy stars rather than support players” in French cuisine.

    The road ahead

    Art is an importance source of reframing, renewal and reinvention, Kingl shows by the end of the book. Artistic forms like drawing and painting can also help people express emotions when they struggle with words. “Expertise is important, but genuine creativity might include putting yourself in the shoes of the beginner,” observes artist Peter Moolan-Feroze. Elements of playfulness and humility help overcome such blocks of prior expertise. Customers and employees expect more humanity and creativity at work today. Leaders must hire diverse employees but also tap their fresh perspectives on what is different and what needs to improve. Technology advances continue to force companies to focus on efficiency and risk management. “Technology is the master of scale, but it need not be our master. Efficiency does not replace innovation, adaptability or inspiration,” the author affirms. “It is up to people, not technology, to create purpose, invent, adapt, engage, connect. In that regard, disciplines like art should not be seen as a fun diversion but as the source of crucial insights and skills,” Kingl signs off. In sum, this is an insightful book for beginning the new year with a boost of creativity, with a combination of compelling examples and actionable tips.

    Read more at: https://yourstory.com/2023/12/creativity-leadership-art-success-book-adam-kingl

    Beach scene

    Three reasons why a holiday can boost creativity and innovation at work

    Three reasons why a holiday can boost creativity and innovation at work

    Perhaps the biggest question in creativity is, ‘What do you do when you’re stuck?’

    By Adam Kingl July 3, 2023

    Perhaps the biggest question in creativity is, ‘What do you do when you’re stuck?’  In interviewing Andrew Reich, one of the head writers and executive producers of hit TV sitcom Friends when researching my latest book, I discovered that there are a number of techniques in boosting the creative process that can be generalised and applied to any function or industry. One of the techniques that emerged repeatedly was to embrace taking breaks, changing one’s environment, even taking a holiday.

    Sometimes the solution is not to encourage a different answer but spark a different mood or energy. In Japanese gardens, if you walk from one area to the next, the garden might suddenly look and feel entirely different, which in Japanese is loosely translated as ‘change feeling.’ If you walked into the writers’ room of hit TV sitcom Friends, so often what they’d be doing would not look as if they were working. They’d be tossing a ball around, playing some stupid game, or just talking about something that seemed totally off subject. But very often they would do that for a while, and then someone would ask, ‘Wait a minute. Is there a story in this?’ So often, appearing as if they were wasting time would lead to: ‘Wait, there is something here!’ There were times when the room would just get really quiet. Everyone was stuck. So how do you get unstuck? Andrew Reich understood that sometimes the team just needed to blow off steam, or be shocked awake, or laugh, or indeed just ‘change feeling.’ A holiday is a similar ‘change feeling’ tactic.

    If the next level of unsticking a group is to change mood, Andrew would take his team into a completely different environment. He relates, ‘I’ve taken teams of about four people on a walk, going back to my earliest writing experiences, maybe not with twelve people because that becomes a parade rather than a walk, and you end up having a bunch of separate conversations. But after sitting for a long time and suddenly you’re out in the fresh air and moving, that alone shakes things up. Or completely the opposite – a nap! I’m a big believer in napping for refreshing the brain. Sometimes you have to get out of the room when you’re hitting a wall. It’s also about keeping perspective to relieve the pressure I may be putting on myself. It’s just a television show. Sometimes it starts to feel so weighty and serious, I have to step back and let go of whatever attachment of the moment I’m obsessing about.’ A holiday, hopefully including copious walks and naps, is perhaps the ultimate practice of changing the environment.

    Working harder doesn’t always produce better results, but creating or recreating the conditions or environment for inspiration does. There is an urban myth that renowned TV writer and show runner Aaron Sorkin of hits like The West Wing would take five showers a day because he comes up with so many great ideas there. If you think, ‘I have to think of a great idea for a show,’ you’re just not going to. The best ideas really often do suddenly appear – a force outside of yourself. So how do you put yourself in a position to be receptive to those things? How do you relax because it will never happen if you’re looking at your phone and doom scrolling? Andrew finds it may happen being in nature, a beach, a forest, and of course in the shower. You do relax there to the point where you realise, ‘I was clenching and working so hard, but as soon as I relaxed, ding! There’s the solution.’ You cannot ‘hard work’ yourself into creativity. Once you have an idea and an outline, then you can work hard. But at the inspiration point of the process, there’s no forcing that. In taking a holiday, you trust the process, yourself and the environment that helps you reach innovative solutions.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Adam Kingl